What makes a piece of art great




















What Makes Good Art? Christine Nishiyama [Might Could Essay]. Imitationalism Art is good when it imitates reality. Formalism Art is good when it masters the artistic elements and principles. Instrumentalism Art is good when it communicates a message. Emotionalism Art is good when it evokes an emotional response. What Makes Good Art to You?

She studied at Saint Petersburg Academy of Arts. Educated in Russia and the United States. Lives in Miami. Has also lived in Russia. Collections expert, exhibitions and loans. E: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Related Content. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy. Copyright Policy. For Buyers. Inside: An explanation of four popular art theories and how each of them defines what makes a work of art good. When it adheres to design principles? If it looks true to life? Should it turn our worldview upside down? Must it fill us with emotions? The issue of what makes an artwork good has probably been debated since the first splotch of pigment touched a cave wall.

It is nearly impossible to define what art is, so when we start discussing what makes an artwork impressive or worthy or good, we wade into complicated waters. Many a rt theories have emerged to encompass the wide variety of ideas and opinions about what art is and what it should do. The search for one art theory to rule them all may be futile, but there are arguments to be made on all sides, and everyone has a favorite. Formalism dictates that art is good when it effectively uses the elements of art and principles of design.

A formalist will concentrate solely on how an artwork looks—color, line, shape, and texture. The story being told and any historical or social context behind the artwork has no bearing on whether it is considered successful. The composition is all that matters. While artists have always used the elements and principles of art, formalism really came into being with modern art and the rise of abstract and expressionist works since those pieces put special emphasis on using line, shape, and color to create a pleasing composition.

The imitationalism or mimetic theory of art claims that artwork is best when it imitates life. It has a simple and rigorous beauty that commands your gaze and thoughts whenever you look at it. The best work will break your heart. As a collector, you will know it when you see it. It's personal. You will not have to be convinced by anyone to acquire it; it will be something you simply must have.

It is like a good marriage that completes a feeling inside you, something that lasts forever and grows with time. The art should effortlessly have as many of these characteristics as possible-- or none at all. It also has to have magic; if you try too hard, the magic could fly away. The artist needs to have a vision and it's important that the work doesn't go into a dead end. It's helpful if the artist has the capacity to reinvent their creativity through various skills and mediums.

People are not willing to take the time and effort to develop their own personal sensibilities through study or reflection but are prone to "go with the flow" from the "tastemakers" so as not to be seen as square and out of touch Maybe somebody is turned on by the nature of the materials, a psychological issue or some kind of narrative. Maybe some people have greater intensities of experience than others.

What makes art good on a grander scale is how extraordinary and profound the components of those experiences are. Some artists are maybe better than others at tapping into their own idiosyncrasies and conveying them to others.

This is the mysterious and subjective key to good art. In all periods of art there are good and bad works of art. I find that defining quality in representational art is easier than in modern and abstract art.



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000