SC2 is just graphic update version of SC1. Go try this on your computer, turn all of your graphic setting to the lowest, you will see it is SC1. Blizzard is just resell SC1 after 12 years with their graphic update. I do enjoy the replay videos that I can share with friends. Did any of your buddy bought SC2? About once a month in the winter there's usually at least 4 of us. Hang out, trash talk, catch up on things, drink, talk more trash, smoke a joint The atmosphere is a lot better when it's you and your close friends as opposed to you sitting in front of a computer doing the same thing.
What do you mean by doesn't have to be fast enough for a 3v3? FWIW there are major delays when playing a 3v3 on my connection. I'm sure that Activision was behind it, that doesn't excuse Blizzard though. In the end the game was put on the market under their name. Am I wrong to expect certain things from the sequel of one of the greatest RTS games ever made? One of those things being keeping certain features that made the game so enjoyable for a lot of us.
I don't think that's unreasonable. Anyways, my reply on battle. First off, most people these days have medicore DSL connections. While it could support a few people connecting to battle. Second, it's stupid to expect every single person at a lan to show up with a copy of the game. It just doesn't happen.
So yes, while people will be copying it around, they still lack the online play capability, and LAN play and campaign only goes so far. Heck, you even provided a spawn version for the original SC cd, meaning you wanted people to be able to play with their friends on LANs.
The only difference between spawn versions and pirated versions is that the pirates get the campaign, and how much do you really think that does? If they like the game, which most people do, they'll go out and buy a copy and get the battle. Third, it's a significant downgrade from what your other games used to be. Whenever people think about blizzard games, they think about quality, improvement, and getting far more for their moneys worth.
Usually blizzard games are a huge improvement over their predecessor, but if you're removing some of the bigger features, this is not a trait of the blizzard we once knew. Ever since you had the cash cow wow, and merged with activision, we only have to wonder if you're interest is with your fans or with the amount of money you'll be making. Last, there is only one reason you'd be removing LAN.
Let's be honest, pirating has never really been an issue for you blizzard, and you know if battle 2. Plus you and I both know you're going to make a killing no matter what on launch day, so why offer a significantly worse product unless there was more to be gained by not offering it?
You know, such as a subscription fee to play online. But then people might use virtual lans and stuff because they don't want to pay. Oh no, gotta remove that so we can pump out more money. If you really are planning a subscription fee for battle. I'm not buying it on launch day anymore. I'm going to wait and see for other people to find out what you've decided to screw up in the name of making money and decide later if its worthwhile.
You buy SC for the multiplayer, and if you're removing large parts of multiplayer for more money, you're not making a sequel to SC, you're making a cash cow. If thats the case, you should of merged with EA. Jun 29 , pm Excalibur Post 2. The sword and the faith. I almost didn't believe it when I read it on TL. Agree with you completely, we'll see how it goes.
Also lulz at the guy making an online petition. Sector 12 My stream, live PC building and tech discussion. Jun 29 , pm UnholyUrine Post 3. Grammar mistake at the last sentence.. I am not too negative against the removal of LAN gaming, as it doesn't directly affect me. But I see no point in removing it, and I'll have to agree that Blizzard will screw up Internet Cafes if they have to buy an SC2 copy for each computer.. Maybe that's what they're trying to pull? I will not buy sc2 for the sake of it.
Seems like Blizzard is just out to make a quick buck now. Why Blizzard? No one plays the same games I do. But I really thought I would get a chance with Diablo 3. I still am going to buy both of them, SC2 and all of it's epic campaigns I agree with 6. They have forsaken us loyal Blizzonians. GG blizz Go fuck yourselves for ruining the future for thousands of LAN parties to come Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able?
Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able, and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God. Quote from "Mreow" ». Quote from "rev" ». This is absurd.
0コメント